Massachusetts lawmakers passed H.5595 on Friday, removing the state’s 24‑week abortion limit and permitting procedures up to the time of birth. The bill, titled “An Act Prioritizing Patient Access to Care,” was approved by the Senate in a final session vote. It follows a House approval of 119‑33 and a subsequent Senate vote of 121‑35.
If signed, the legislation would place Massachusetts among states such as Alaska, Colorado, and Oregon that impose no time limits on abortion. The new law eliminates the four narrow statutory categories that previously restricted post‑24‑week procedures to cases of maternal life or health, lethal fetal anomaly, or grave fetal diagnosis.
Instead, the act allows a physician to perform an abortion based on professional judgment. Senate President described the measure as ensuring reproductive care is accessible close to home and within the state’s advanced medical system.
Senator Robyn Kennedy, a primary sponsor, said the change would grant women full autonomy over the care they need, when and where they need it. Senators Joan Lovely and Cindy Friedman echoed similar sentiments about expanding patient choice.
Opponents argue the bill opens the door to abortions of healthy, viable fetuses up to birth. They point to concerns that late‑term procedures could occur when unborn children may feel pain and could survive outside the womb.
Republican legislators described the passage as a significant shift toward a more progressive abortion policy, with some calling it a “very sad day” for the Commonwealth. The Catholic Bishops of Massachusetts issued a statement opposing the measure as radical and immoral, urging a reevaluation of the dignity of human life.
Governor has historically supported expansive abortion access and has previously signed protective shield laws. As of early Saturday, the governor has not signed the bill and has not issued a formal statement on the final version.
The Senate Committee on Ways and Means is currently reviewing additional legislation that may further impact abortion policy, indicating that debate on the issue remains ongoing.
