TRUMP UNDER ATTACK: German TV's €8 BILLION SMEAR CAMPAIGN EXPOSED!

A disturbing pattern is emerging, one that questions the integrity of supposed allies. Following the resignation of top BBC executives over a manipulated documentary about former President Trump, a new revelation points to a similar deception broadcast by Germany’s ARD public television.

The core of the issue? Both broadcasters presented a deliberately misleading edit of President Trump’s January 6th speech, creating the false impression he directly incited violence at the Capitol. The original speech clearly called for supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically,” a crucial detail excised from both versions.

ARD’s documentary, “Storm on the Capitol,” mirrored the BBC’s tactic. It strategically cut Trump’s words, splicing in a later statement – delivered *after* the unrest began – where he urged supporters to “fight like hell.” This manipulation fundamentally altered the context and meaning of his message.

The BBC issued a formal apology and saw its leadership fall. Yet, ARD, funded by over $9 billion annually in mandatory fees, remains defiant. They claim the edit wasn’t misleading, but rather intended to “illustrate the mood of the crowd,” dismissing the omitted context as “of no relevance.”

This isn’t an isolated incident. Reports detail a consistent bias within German public broadcasting against the former President and, more broadly, against the United States. Examples include artificially amplifying negative reactions to Trump’s speeches and misrepresenting his statements on sensitive issues.

One German broadcaster’s Washington correspondent openly labeled Trump a “fascist” and authored a book predicting the “destruction of America” under his leadership. Another incident involved an interpreter caught on a hot mic expressing disdain for the 47th President during his inauguration.

The accusations extend to deliberately inflammatory reporting, including false claims about Trump’s views on immigration and even inciting violence against political opponents. This relentless stream of negative coverage raises serious questions about journalistic standards and national interests.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, has been vocal, stating that Germany’s public television has been “worse than the BBC” and demanding accountability. The situation begs a critical question: what is the cost of defending allies who actively undermine the United States?

The pattern of biased reporting and deliberate manipulation demands a response. The integrity of international relations relies on honest and accurate information, not manufactured narratives designed to damage reputations and sow discord.